This write-up is related to my earlier post
titled ‘The E.M.P (Environmental
Management Program)’. Here, a sample of the terms and conditions of an approved
EIA is displayed, and, as I mentioned then that this is amongst the basis
of establishing an EMP. The checklist
consists of all the terms of approval from the authority i.e. the DOE in
Malaysia, and in this example, it’s for a new electrical powered intercity
public train rail track system. In this project both the project proponent and its main
contractor are certified ISO14001.
I hope readers who are pursuing civil engineering, environmental engineering,
environmental sciences, occupational health and safety, urban and town
planning, etc. would treat this example as a connotation of the likely demands in
one’s career. Welcome to the multi-disciplinary integrated ‘web’ of
environmental management where collective decisions is the ‘operating system’ and
more than 10 agencies are appointed ‘browsers’. This example is one of their
many endeavors that illustrate the shared-responsibility.
My personal opinion on the EIA conditions concludes this article. Bon voyage!
Electrified Double Track Train EIA – Sample
Checklist on EIA Approval Conditions
(Note: the project title, its
owners, municipals and the respective provinces were omitted in ensuring the
integrity of this article.)
This
checklist was produced by the main contractor’s HSE team by referring to the EIA
approval issued to the project owner (project proponent), after the former was
awarded the construction job. Their purpose for creating this checklist is as
follows;
- Establish an EMP based on special EMP format issued by the DOE;
- Subjected to DOE consent;
- Referred as ‘legal standard’ for the
DOE;
- Evidence of associated legal
liability.
- Distribution to their Environmental Unit as the
main ‘Audit Standard’ for their
scheduled audits;
- Basis of a continuous environmental
surveillance;
- Basis of training for their project
managers, construction managers, engineers etc.
- Record of compliance throughout the
project; (as seen in column ‘compliance actions’ below)
- Distribution to their construction team as to
integrate it into their detailed
construction plan;
- Cascaded to respective
sub-contractors;
- Environmental standards imposed upon
sub-contractors;
- Basis of trainings and briefings to
sub-contractors;
- Basis of penalty for their non-compliance;
- Updated reference of compliance when facilitating
site-visits and inspection by
authorities.
EIA Conditions of Approval
|
Compliance Actions
|
||||||||||||
COMPLIANCE
|
|||||||||||||
1.
|
All mitigation and control
measures outlined in the report and additional information as listed below
prepared by the EIA consultant, (Consultant).
are to be complied fully:-
(i)
EIA report entitled
Environmental Impact Assessment For the Proposed Electrified Double Tracking
Railway Project Between (town) - (town), Final Report, July 2002;
(ii)
Additional information titled
‘Environmental Impact Assessment For the Proposed Electrified Double Tracking
Railway Project Between (town) - (town), Final Report Addendum 1 (Soil Erosion
& Sedimentation), August 2002’; and
(iii)
Additional Information titled
‘Jawapan Perunding EIA Kepada Soalan dan Komen-Komen, Cadangan
Pembinaan Landasan Berkembar Elektrik Antara (town)
- (town) oleh (Project
Proponent) submitted to the DOE on 4th October 2002.
|
The Project proponent will
comply with the mitigation and control measure outlined in the EIA report for
all items which cause by the project proponent during the construction stage.
|
|||||||||||
PROJECT
CONCEPT
|
|||||||||||||
2.
|
The development is confined to
the construction of the railway track and other related components for a
distance of (project length in km) from (town) - (town).
|
There are no changes to the
project concept.
|
|||||||||||
3.
|
Traffic management plans
covering any diversions are to be prepared and approved by the related Local Authorities.
|
Traffic management plan will be
prepared and seek approval from (Local Authorities)
where necessary.
|
|||||||||||
4.
|
Structures such as the railroad
bridges or vehicular crossing or any overhead for pedestrians are to be
constructed at areas where the public used for crossing.
|
Pedestrian or vehicular crossing
will be provided as needed according to construction requirements.
|
|||||||||||
5.
|
The routes for vehicles
transporting construction material are to be planned well to reduce
disturbance to the residential areas and other main users.
|
The project proponents will plan
the routes for vehicles transporting construction material. The routes to be
used where possible shall avoid the residential areas in the vicinity of the
track.
|
|||||||||||
6.
|
Any tree cutting or the
relocation of trees and the landscape plan is to be submitted and approved by
the Local Authority.
|
Will inform Local Authority and
seek advice before is such cases happen.
|
|||||||||||
7.
|
The relocation of squatters,
public amenities or basic facilities is to be implemented as per agreement
with the relevant State Authorities /Local Authorities.
|
Matters pertaining to the
relocation of squatters will be discussed with (Project
Proponent) or relevant Authority before implementation.
|
|||||||||||
8.
|
‘Culverts’ are to be constructed
close to the forest so that the wild life such as wild pigs, leopard and
antelopes can cross over the railway track.
|
(Main
Contractor) will obtained clearance from the
Department of Wildlife for each construction package to ensure that culverts
or necessary measure for wildlife is required or otherwise.
|
|||||||||||
9.
|
Wildlife crossing are to be
constructed in areas where groups of primates are located such as monkeys,
baboons and others to ease crossing the electrified railway track.
|
(Main
Contractor) will obtained clearance from the
Department of Wildlife for each construction package to ensure that the wild
life crossings are required or otherwise.
|
|||||||||||
NOISE CONTROL
|
|||||||||||||
10.
|
The noise levels at the boundary
of the project during construction is to be control so as not to exceed 65 dBA
(daytime) and 55 dBA (nighttime). For areas where the alignment is located
close to houses, construction at night is not allowed.
|
Noise measurements shall be
monitored during the construction activities so that the noise levels are
kept below 65 dBA (daytime) and 55 dBA (nighttime). If construction in night
time is inevitable, the noise level shall be control under 55 dBA as per
requirement.
|
|||||||||||
11
|
The noise levels during
operation are to comply to the following levels for each category of
receptor.
The L90 is to be determined and
agreed by the DOE prior to the operations of the electrified double tracking
line. The measurements are to follow the ‘Procedure For Measurement Of Noise Emission
Levels’ published by DOE and to be conducted by a certified acoustic
engineer.
(Note: L90 is the noise
measurement representing 90% of the noise at site prior to the operational of
the project).
|
The design of the railway track
based on international standards takes into account of the noise levels with
the movement of the trains. Noise level shall be monitored by the operator
during operations to ascertain the effectiveness of the measure in place.
|
|||||||||||
12.
|
In areas where the reserves are
limited or too near especially in areas between housing schemes and school,
control measures such as the installation of ‘noise barriers’ are to be
implemented. The steps taken should be able to reduce noise to levels as
outlined in condition 10 and 11 above. Measures to control vibration are to
be implemented especially for routes crossing housing areas and sensitive
areas.
|
There are no schools located
close to the railway track ROW. Nevertheless noise barriers will be provided
in areas identified as extremely sensitive which will be reviewed together
with (Project Proponent).
|
|||||||||||
SAFETY AND
EMERGENCY CONTROL
|
|||||||||||||
13.
|
Emergency Response Plan that
outlines actions that are to be taken if any accidents occur such as oil
spills or toxic releases to avoid contamination to air, soil river and
groundwater is to be prepared and submitted to Jabatan Keretapi
|
The Emergency Response Plan has
been prepared and submitted to the DOE (HQ), Respective state DOE offices and
(Project Proponent).
|
|||||||||||
14.
|
All Control measures to reduce
vibration and nuisance to structures during the construction works and
operational stage are to be implemented.
|
Vibration monitoring will be
conducted during construction to ensure vibration levels are kept within
acceptable limits.
|
|||||||||||
15.
|
Adequate
temporary barriers are to be constructed especially in areas where the
reserves are limited during the construction activities.
|
Temporary barriers shall be
provided in areas identified.
|
|||||||||||
CONSTRUCTION
AND EARTHWORKS CONTROL
|
|||||||||||||
16.
|
The scheduling of the earthworks
is to be synchronized with the dry season to reduce sediments.
|
Adequate mitigation measure will
be taken to ensure Earthworks construction will not have any adverse impact
on the surrounding environment.
|
|||||||||||
17.
|
Any excess earth available at
site is to be used as bunds at the boundary of the project site. The bunds
are to be compacted and landscape.
|
It is anticipated that there
will not be any excess earth at site. However, in the event that there is
excess earth this will be used as landscaping purposes or transport to
adequate landfill area.
|
|||||||||||
18.
|
Effective measure including
resolving issue at the design stage as recommended by JPS in areas that have
been identified as potential flood areas are to be implemented.
|
All requirement outline in the
Urban Storm Water
Management Manual (MASMA) where
relevant will be complied accordingly.
|
|||||||||||
19.
|
Any earth to be imported to the
site is to be conducted after the paddy harvesting period. Monitoring shall
be conducted to ensure construction work do not cause toxic effect to the
paddy areas.
|
Will comply and ensure fill
material do not cause toxic effects to the paddy areas.
|
|||||||||||
WATER QUALITY
CONTROL
|
|||||||||||||
20.
|
Temporary toilet facilities,
meeting the Ministry of Health specification are to be made available at the
workers camp before construction works begin.
|
Temporary toilet facilities will
be provided at the identified site offices and workers camp. And shall comply
with Specification from the Ministry of Health for toilet facilities.
|
|||||||||||
21.
|
Silt traps,
sediment ponds and the drainage system such as the perimeter drain and other
in area that can channel runoffs are to be prepared prior to any land
clearing works at the site. The details for the location of this system are
to be submitted to the DOE. Any discharges from the sedimentation pond to any
water course shall not contain any suspended solids in excess of 100mg/l.
Monitoring of the discharges from the sedimentation pond during construction
shall be conducted.
|
Silt trap and
other mitigation measure shall be installed along the railway track route
subject to the condition of site.
|
|||||||||||
22.
|
Effective
measure to avoid water pollution due to earthwork and construction activities
(such as oil spills) is to implement especially for sensitive areas such as
the (An Environmental Sensitive Area) which
has a water intake point.
|
All skid tanks
installed at the construction sites will be provided with secondary
containment to collect any spillages and thus avoiding water pollution at
site.
|
|||||||||||
WASTES DISPOSAL
|
|||||||||||||
23.
|
A good solid
waste management system is to be provided and the waste are to be disposed at
approved Local Authorities dumping site.
|
A waste
management system shall be provided for the site. All wastes shall be
stockpiled at a dedicated area near the ROW and the wastes shall be disposed
at approval Local Authorities dumping site.
|
|||||||||||
24.
|
Scheduled
wastes such as ‘spent oil’, ‘hydraulic oil’ and others have to be managed
according to the requirement outline in the Environmental Quality (Scheduled Wastes)
Regulations, 2005.
|
Used oil from
machinery and vehicle shall be collected and stored temporary at the
designated maintenance yard. A vendor licensed by the DOE shall be appointed
to collect the used oil for disposal purposes.
|
|||||||||||
AIR QUALITY CONTROL
|
|||||||||||||
25.
|
Land clearing
is to be conducted in stages and confined to areas to be developed only.
|
Land clearing
will be control to a minimal level.
|
|||||||||||
26.
|
Open surface,
especially in areas where routes for heavy construction machinery are used
are to be kept wet so as not to be dusty during the earthwork stage.
|
A water browser
shall be used to suppress any fugitive dusts that may result from the
movement of vehicle at site.
|
|||||||||||
27.
|
Wheels of
machinery and vehicles are to be kept clean prior to moving on to public
roads.
|
A wheel washing
trough or other washing facilities will be provided at all main access to the
construction site so that wheels are kept cleaned prior to moving on the
roads.
|
|||||||||||
28.
|
Open burning of
biomass and construction wastes is prohibited at all times.
|
All workers
will be trained prior to any works at site to ensure that all environmental
requirements are followed closely including the need to observe no open
burning.
|
|||||||||||
MANAGEMENT OF ARTIFACTS
|
|||||||||||||
29.
|
Control measure
relating to the transfer, salvage and conservation of any artifacts of
historical values as agreed by (Project Proponent)
in Jadual A, Minutes to the EIA Meeting for the Proposed Electrified Double
Railway Track Between (town to town) dated 15
September 2002 is too implemented.
|
The Project
proponent will discuss with (Project Proponent)
and confirm the necessary measures that need to be taken for the structures
listed within Jadual A.
|
|||||||||||
MONITORING PROGRAMS
|
|||||||||||||
30.
|
Monitoring
programs for air quality, noise levels, vibration and water quality taking
into account the sampling stations and frequency of sampling is to be
submitted to DOE’s office in (name of affected
states/provinces) for agreement 3 month prior to any works.
|
The proposed
program, frequency and sampling station will be listed within the submit EMP.
|
|||||||||||
ENVIROMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
|
|||||||||||||
31.
|
An Environment Management
Plan according to the format given is to be submitted to the DOE’s Office in (name of affected states/provinces) for agreement
and a copy is to be submitted to The DOE’s Headquarter, 3 month prior to any
works at site. The EMP is to be reviewed from time to time meet current
requirement.
|
EMP will be
prepare, submit and review accordingly.
|
|||||||||||
32.
|
The reports are
to be submitted to the DOE’s Office (name of
affected states/provinces) with a copy to the DOE’s Headquarters once
in 3 months from the date of commencement.
|
The report will
be submitted accordingly.
|
|||||||||||
33.
|
The following
reports are to be submitted to the DOE’s office in (name
of affected states/provinces) with a copy to DOE Headquarters:-
(i)
A water quality monitoring
and assessment report once in 3 month from the earthworks. The monitoring
program shall include testing Parameters such as BOD, COD, DO, TSS, Oil &
Grease, pH, Turbidity and Ammoniacal Nitrogen.
(ii)
Ambient air quality
monitoring and assessment report once in 3 month from the date of earthworks.
The monitoring program shall include parameters such as TSP,SOx and NOx.
(iii)
Noise and vibration
monitoring and analysis at the boundary of the project during construction
and operation stage to be conducted and its report submitted once in 3 month.
|
The baseline
water quality, air quality, noise and vibration levels shall be reestablished
prior to the construction activities at site and sampling shall be conducted
as per the recommendations outline in this EMP.
|
|||||||||||
ADMINISTRATION
|
|||||||||||||
34.
|
The project
proponent is to including the EIA approval conditions as part of the Contract
Document for all contract involved with the development of the project and
all EIA approval conditions shall have to be complied accordingly.
|
The project
proponent will undertake full responsibilities for the EIA approval conditions
and will include it under the contract to other contractor where applicable.
|
|||||||||||
35.
|
The DOE’s Office
in (name of affected states/provinces) is to
informed in writing, the actual dates the project begin not later than 14
days after the project starts and 14 days after the project completed.
|
The DOE’s
Office in (name of affected states/provinces) will
be informed on the commencement
|
|||||||||||
36.
|
The DOE is to
be informed in writing of any changes in the management or ownership of the
project. The EIA approval conditions are to be included in any change in
ownership for the Proposed Project.
|
The DOE shall
be informed if there are any changes in the management of the project.
|
|||||||||||
37.
|
A copy of the
EIA approval conditions together will all the relevant documents that forms part of the EIA approval
conditions are to be exhibited in a suitable place at the project site from
the date of earthworks .
|
A copy of the
EIA approval condition shall be exhibited at all the site offices identified
for the project.
|
|||||||||||
Personal Comment
Item-8 & 10; ‘close to houses’ – specifying the distance is a better option;
Item – 8; ‘cross-over’ or ‘cross-under’ the culvert?
Item-10; Imposing
restricted noise level is relevant. But these arbitraries seemed least
realistic; as in remote village or areas with almost minimal human activities
the noise measurement are generally at much lower range about 30 – 40 dBA. Say,
imposing a 55dBA in the day as the project starts would disallow heavy machineries
such as prime-movers, generator-sets, back-hoe, excavators, etc. to work there
as they are powered by large and noisy diesel engines. However, the noise level
for the electric train operation (item-11) may be applicable as noise is
presumed to be generated from the sound of frictions only.
Item-12 & 14; I have imparted and shared with participants in most of my training on Pollution & Control that; the brick-wall noise barrier is not a good solution simply because it’s an eye-sore to sights and seeing. For and electric train when noise is far less it is much more favorable to have ‘green-walls’ from dense shrubs species that could be planted and maintained at just 4 feet height. It could also hinder wild animals from crossing the rail track when they are planted in a correct configuration. (see picture below)
Item-16; should alter the last part of the sentence to ‘to reduce sedimentation of receiving water bodies from surface run-off’
Personal Inference
These terms and conditions are adequate to prevent the occurrence of
environmental impact in the form of water, noise, air and groundwater pollution
at a severity level which is conspicuous to the public, if adhered to promptly.
Of course, some may argue that this project has maimed the bio-diversity and
geological settings of the affected earth profiles. My simple answer to this
argument is: All human activities do
affect the environment, and, there is no absolute solution to pollution!
But, at least this project is a public transport, well, inevitably incurring
some cost to our environment but, it’ll help the people to travel conveniently,
and, the dispersed emission from automobile if they drive cars, are now
centralized at power generation plant that powers these electrified trains. Apparently,
I believe, from the viewpoint of Life-Cycle-Assessment, even the electric cars
can’t match the environmental economics of these electric trains! In other
words, its environmental benefits surpassed its cost. So, how about employing electric
tramps or carriages in the cities and residential areas? I sincerely hope that the
next batch of ‘Yang Berhormat’ who
are entrusted with the transport portfolio be not mere technocrats but instead
empathetic environmentalists who are altruistic if not holly-hearted, who’d
bring more greener practices for the ‘rakyat’ (people). As from where I am it’s
still ‘A Track Too Far’.
No comments:
Post a Comment