This paper displays and discuss environmental issues related to coal-fired power plants in a holistic manner. Summary of applicable legal requirements in Malaysia are provided throughout the chronology of this industrial activity. Presented in public on April 24, 2012 in Impiana KLCC Hotel, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia as invited speaker for Marlene Insurance Brokers Sdn Bhd in an event for Tenaga Nasional Berhad titled "Seminar On Power Utility Operations & Maintenance Management".
Example chemical structure of coal |
Anthracite (Ibbenbüren, Germany) |
Bituminous coal |
KOTA KINABALU Feb 16 — Sabah has scrapped the controversial coal-fired
power plant in Lahad Datu saying today it will look for alternative energy
sources after a three year-long campaign by environmentalists. “I am pleased to announce that
federal and state governments have agreed to pursue other alternative sources
of energy namely gas to meet Sabah’s power supply needs ” Sabah Chief Minister
Datuk Seri Musa Aman said in a statement released this afternoon “I know there
have been certain objections to the proposed coal powered plant Today is proof
that such objections have not fallen on deaf ears ” The Department of
Environment DOE had rejected the detailed environmental impact assessment DEIA
for the proposed RM1 3 billion 300-MW coal-fired plant in Felda Sahabat in
August last year because many important environmental parameters in the
proposed project were not addressed in the report. (1)
The powdered
coal from the coal mills is carried to the boiler in coal pipes by high
pressure hot air. The pulverized coal
air mixture is burnt in the boiler in the combustion zone.
Generally in modern boilers tangential firing system is used i.e. the coal nozzles/ guns form tangent to a circle. The temperature in fire ball is of the order of 1300 deg.C. The boiler is a water tube boiler hanging from the top. Water is converted to steam in the boiler and steam is separated from water in the boiler Drum. The saturated steam from the boiler drum is taken to the Low Temperature Superheater, Platen Superheater and Final Superheater respectively for superheating. The superheated steam from the final superheater is taken to the High Pressure Steam Turbine (HPT). In the HPT the steam pressure is utilized to rotate the turbine and the resultant is rotational energy. From the HPT the out coming steam is taken to the Reheater in the boiler to increase its temperature as the steam becomes wet at the HPT outlet. After reheating this steam is taken to the Intermediate Pressure Turbine (IPT) and then to the Low Pressure Turbine (LPT). The outlet of the LPT is sent to the condenser for condensing back to water by a cooling water system. This condensed water is collected in the Hotwell and is again sent to the boiler in a closed cycle. The rotational energy imparted to the turbine by high pressure steam is converted to electrical energy in the Generator.
Generally in modern boilers tangential firing system is used i.e. the coal nozzles/ guns form tangent to a circle. The temperature in fire ball is of the order of 1300 deg.C. The boiler is a water tube boiler hanging from the top. Water is converted to steam in the boiler and steam is separated from water in the boiler Drum. The saturated steam from the boiler drum is taken to the Low Temperature Superheater, Platen Superheater and Final Superheater respectively for superheating. The superheated steam from the final superheater is taken to the High Pressure Steam Turbine (HPT). In the HPT the steam pressure is utilized to rotate the turbine and the resultant is rotational energy. From the HPT the out coming steam is taken to the Reheater in the boiler to increase its temperature as the steam becomes wet at the HPT outlet. After reheating this steam is taken to the Intermediate Pressure Turbine (IPT) and then to the Low Pressure Turbine (LPT). The outlet of the LPT is sent to the condenser for condensing back to water by a cooling water system. This condensed water is collected in the Hotwell and is again sent to the boiler in a closed cycle. The rotational energy imparted to the turbine by high pressure steam is converted to electrical energy in the Generator.
Deforestation.
· reduces the content of water in
the soil and groundwater as well as atmospheric moisture;
§ their canopies intercept a proportion of precipitation, which is then evaporated back to the atmosphere (canopy interception);
§ their litter and other organic residue
change soil properties that affect the capacity of soil to store water.
their
leaves control the humidity of the
atmosphere by transpiring. 99% of the water absorbed by the roots moves up
to the leaves and is transpired.
Legal
liability
· Mountain-top
deforestation for mining purposes in Malaysia is subjected to EIA as classified
under Forestry as “ Conversion
of hill forest land to other land use covering an area of 50 hectares or more.”
Or under Order-2, Environmental Quality (Prescribed Activities)
(Environmental Impact Assessment) Order, 1987. The ‘Schedule’.
· Mining
as “Mining of minerals in new area where the mining lease covers a total area
in excess of 250 hectares.” – Order-2, Environmental Quality
(Prescribed Activities) (Environmental Impact Assessment) Order, 1987. The
‘Schedule’.
Judicial liability for not providing the EIA report as projects gets
underway is RM100,000.00 and/or 5 years imprisonment.
Mountains are geological structures that serves as the
strongest civil structure that holds
the earth crust. They are rocks of
different formation and composition
that emerged from their respective plates
that forms the earth surface. Mountain ranges form in a process called orogenesis, where two tectonic plates
meet.(34)
By nature they are
dynamic and thus unstable as natural
forces are constantly applying pressure
from below its geological settings. However, science haven’t finish learning
about them and can’t make much accurate prediction of their behaviour. Nonetheless,
their desirable constituents to man
are known and named. They include minerals
and metals like palladium, titanium,
uranium (4)(5), gold etc., and of cause oil
and coal. Coal mining generates significant
additionally independent adverse environmental
health impacts, among them the water
pollution flowing from mountaintop removal mining.(2)
§ Impact of water use on flows of rivers and consequent impact on other land uses;
§ Dust;
§ Tunnels sometimes damage infrastructure
(e.g. roads);
§ Land rendered unsuitable for other use.
Entitles for EiMAS CPD Hours:12 (EiMAS/2016/CPD395/1 dated 3rd Feb 2016) Kindly email for full brochure and registration form at sekitar5221@gmail.com |
Pollutants for which indirect exposure is especially important
include mercury, arsenic, dioxins,
cadmium and lead. Mercury
contamination of fish (and subsequent consumption by humans) is the cause of fish
consumption advisories in 40 states for inland waters and advisories for some
saltwater species in 10 states.(3)There are a number of adverse environmental effects of coal mining and burning, specially
in power stations including: Generation of hundreds of millions of tons of
waste products, including fly ash, bottom ash, flue gas desulfurization sludge,
that contain mercury, uranium, thorium, arsenic, and other heavy
metals.(4)Trace elements of uranium. All but 16 of the 92
naturally occurring elements have been detected in coal, mostly as trace
elements below 0.1 percent (1,000 parts per million, or ppm). A study by DOE's Oak Ridge National Lab found that radioactive emissions from coal combustion are greater than those from nuclear
power production.(5)
We have heard about a
fatal accident explosion at a coal
mine in central China that killed 26
miners in Dec 08, 2010. They were working despite an order to halt
production. And, a mine tunnel collapse
elsewhere left four dead in the latest accidents to strike the country’s mining
industry.
Technical and economic feasibility are evaluated based on: regional
geologic conditions; overburden characteristics; coal seam continuity,
thickness, structure, quality, and depth; strength of materials above and below
the seam for roof and floor conditions; topography (especially altitude and
slope); climate; land ownership as it affects the availability of land for
mining and access; surface drainage patterns; ground water conditions;
availability of labor and materials; coal purchaser requirements in terms of
tonnage, quality, and destination; and capital
investment requirements.(6)
Surface mining and deep underground
mining are the two basic methods of mining. The choice of mining method depends
primarily on depth of burial, density of the overburden and thickness of the coal seam. Seams
relatively close to the surface, at depths less
than approximately 180 ft (50 m), are usually surface mined. Coal that
occurs at depths of 180 to 300 ft
(50 to 100 m) are usually deep mined, but in some cases surface mining
techniques can be used. For example, some western U.S. coal that occur at
depths in excess of 200 ft (60 m) are mined by the open pit methods, due
to thickness of the seam 60–90 feet (20–30 m). Coals occurring below
300 ft (100 m) are usually deep mined.(7)
Surface coal mining
with valley fills has impaired the
aquatic life in numerous streams in the Central Appalachian Mountains. Our
results show that mining activity has had subtle to severe impacts on benthic
macroinvertebrate
communities and that the biological condition most strongly correlates with a gradient
of
ionic strength.(8)
Legal
liability
v Coal transport railway:
its construction is subjected to the EIA
requirements as classified under activity ‘Railways’
covering a) Construction of new
routes and b) Construction of branched lines.
Port facility: its construction is its construction is subjected to the EIA requirements as classified under activity ‘Ports’ covering Construction of ports
and Port expansion involving an increase of 50% or more in handling capacity
per annum.
‘When coal
cargo oxidises, it spontaneously generates heat and toxic gases such as
carbon monoxide. This can lead to flammable
atmospheres in the hold, depletion of oxygen in those spaces and corrosion of
metal structures. Lower quality coals such as lignite are more prone to this process than higher quality coals
such as anthracite. Understanding
the quality of coal being shipped and how to monitor it is fundamental to
reducing the risk of self-heating, and possibly the outbreak of fire.’(9)
‘A Chinese coal-carrier, the Shen Neng 1, loaded with 65,000 tonnes of coal and 975
tonnes of fuel oil, ran aground on the Great
Barrier Reef over Easter. The 230-metre ship, on its way from
Gladstone to China, strayed from authorised shipping channels into a restricted
zone and hit Douglas Shoal, near Rockhampton, at full speed.’(10)
Transporting coal produces significant
quantities of air pollution and other environmental problems. Diesel trucks,
trains, and barges which transport
coal all emit toxic chemicals, such
as nitrogen oxide and particulates, which pose serious public health risks. According to a National
Resources Defense Council study, railroad engines and trucks hauling coal
together release more than 600,000 tons of nitrogen oxide and 50,000 tons of
particulate matter into the air every year, mostly in diesel exhaust.(11)
The environmental impact of shipping includes greenhouse gas emissions and oil pollution. Carbon
dioxide emissions
from shipping is currently estimated at 4
to 5% of the global total, and estimated by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO)
to rise by up to 72% by 2020 if no action is taken.(12)
Legal
liability
Additionally, it is also worthwhile
to check issues pertainning to legal
liabilities for any untoward but
probable marine accidents or
incidents that may cause coal to contaminate marine waters. Marine waters are
legally classified into ‘international waters’ or ‘nations’ waters’. In high seas
or international waters ship owners
or transporters and its underwriters are exposed to the Law of The Sea. When the vessel or barge enters within 200 nautical miles of any states, the Exclusive Economic Zone Act, 1984 is applied. And, as it enters
within 12 nautical miles of the
state’s lowest tide shore line they are within the state’s full jurisdiction
under their respective state’s marine and/or environmental legislation. The
contamination of Malaysian marine waters are stipulated under The Environmental Quality Act, 1974
(EQA’74) – Section 27 and 29 for
‘waste, oil and sludge’ which carries a maximum penalty of RM500,000.00 and/or
5 years imprisonment.
Leachate
emanating from a coal-storage area
at an electricutility plant in Northwest Indiana (U.S.A.) is impacting groundwater quality. This
assessment is based on results of a long-term groundwater monitoring program
conducted at Purdue University's Wade
Utility Plant where a monthly average of 32,000 metric tons of both high- and low-sulfur coal are stored.(13)
Pulverizer is a mechanical device for the grinding of many different types of
materials. Types of Pulverisers: Ball
and Tube mills; Ring and Ball
mills; MPS; Ball mill; Demolition. Raw
material enters the top of the pulverizer through the raw material feed pipe.
The raw material is then pulverized between the roll and rotating ring. Hot air is forced in through the bottom
of the pulverizing chamber to remove unwanted moisture and transport the
material dust up through the top of the pulverizer and out the exhaust pipe directly to the burner. Material that has not been
pulverized into fine enough particles cannot be blown out of the top of the
unit; it falls back to the ring and roll to be further pulverized.
Environmental
Issues
·
Dusts;
Although dust sizes are still far larger than 10 um i.e. above 70um, it still pose a threat
especially during plant shut-down and start-up. “Major environmental risk in
coal pulverizer operation is known to be explosion.
The main explosion hazard associated with a pulverizer is related to start-up and shut-down procedures. When a system goes down under load, all the
coal falls out of suspension. The
internal surfaces are at elevated temperatures and the process of spontaneous combustion begins
immediately.”(15)
·
Noise;
According to a report by SENES Consultants Limited titled NOISE ASSESSMENT
STUDY BRANDON GENERATING STATION quoted: “When in operation, the noise from the
boiler, coal pulverizers, pumps
and fans are the dominant noise
sources inside the building, with pulverizers
and Station air compressor being the chief sources on the main floor and the boiler on
the higher floors.
·
Vibration;
On paper it’s all about observing technical specifications, but, in practice a
different ball game comes to play – cost! Maintenance
should not be compromised with cost.
A report showed that inaccurate parts
replacement in pulverizers has led to excessive vibration. “Normal bearing vibration should be less than .10 IPS velocity.
Vibration data collection and monitoring was conducted over several days and it
was found that the vibration level would change from one startup to the next”
.... “used the incorrect bearing outer race measurement”(16)
·
Heat is convected from
pipes and metal surfaces that embodied the equipment continuously and dispersed
constantly within the process area or building;
Dryers: they are used in order to remove the excess moisture from coal which are
usually wetted during transport. As the presence
of moisture will result in fall in efficiency due to incomplete combustion and
also result in CO emission. The Coal-In-Tube
Dryer (CIT) technology enables operating parameters such as pressure and rotating speed
can be automatically determined in response to inlet coal moisture and
throughput in order to maintain the desired outlet moisture. Optimum moisture is needed
to facilitate a kind of ‘wet oxidation’ that enhance combustibility.
Environmental Issue:
·
‘Fugitive dust’ that escape through
pin-holes or cracks at joints and bends; since the acidic nature, abrasive
power and speed is an attrition to metal parts and pipes;
·
Heat is released
continuously and dispersed constantly within the process area or building;
·
Solid wastes; are usually broken
equipments and parts;
·
Material spillage; spill-over from
loose conveyor belts;
·
Oil spillage; from leaking oil
sumps, gear-box, pumps, etc.
·
Noise; from conveyors
transfer-drops, mechanical moving parts, etc.
Legal Liability
·
‘Fugitive dust’; are not measurable
as ‘point-source’ emission. But, experiences from root-cause-analyses derived from ambient air quality data that showed marked higher readings on Total
Suspended Particulates (TSP), have narrowed down to this equipment system
as one of the sources.
·
Heat; is not regulated
under the EQA’74 for its thermal impact but may be covered in occupational
health and safety provisions.
·
Solid wastes; Only when these
broken parts are contaminated with lubricating or hydraulic oil or other
sheduled waste would they be rendered as scheduled waste: SW 422 - A mixture of scheduled and
non-scheduled wastes
·
Material spillage; Coal granules are
not subjected to the EQA’74 but if it remained to be evident as contaminating
the soil then the operation is
liable under Section 24, Environmental Quality Act, 1974
that
prohibit soil contamination.
·
Oil spillage; If they are
recovered and contained then they are regarded as scheduled waste under SW
408 - Contaminated soil, debris or matter resulting
from cleaning-up of a spill of chemical, mineral oil or scheduled wastes, otherwise,
the contaminated area shall pose as an evidence of soil contamination and
liable to Section 24, Environmental Quality Act, 1974.
Noise; its permitted level shall conform to the limits allowed by the DOE under their EIA Approval terms and conditions as measured usually at the
premise’s boundary perimeters.
Magnetic separators: Coal
which is brought in may contain contaminants like iron particles. These iron particles may cause unnecessary or
premature wear and tear to mechnical parts of subsequent processes. The iron
particles may include bolts, nuts wire
fish plates etc. So, these undesirable contaminants are removed with the
help of magnetic separators. The ‘cleaner’ coal are transferred to the
storage site usually near the boiler.
“A concentrated stream of the inorganic minerals is withdrawn from the
pulverizer and processed by the magnetic separator.”(17)
Environmental
issue:
v
Dry Magnetic Separator;
Ø
Residues or trapped
impurities retained and later released from the separator.
Ø
Dust of fine particles;
Ø
Solid waste of coarse
particles and granules.
v
Wet Magnetic Separator;
Ø
Wastewater containing
retentate from the separator.
Legal Liability
Ø
‘Residues or trapped
impurities retained and later released from the separator and Solid waste of
coarse particles and granules.’ These waste or their final waste considering posibilities of recovery
efforts, may subscribe to the Environmental Quality (Scheduled Wastes)
Regulations, 2005 under the following possible classification;
§
SW 101 Waste containing arsenic or its
compound; or
§
SW 109 Waste containing mercury or its
compound; or
§
SW 205 Waste gypsum arising from chemical
industry or power plant (need justification);
§
SW 407 Waste containing dioxins or
furans;
§
SW 410 Rags, plastics, papers or filters
contaminated with scheduled wastes;
§
SW 421 A
mixture of scheduled wastes
§
SW 422 A mixture of scheduled and
non-scheduled wastes
Ø
Dust of fine particles are subjected to the law if released prior an
air pollution control equipment such as the Filter Bag or Electrostatic
Precipitator namely the Environmental
Quality (Clean Air) Regulations, 1978 or other restrictions inposed under
their EIA approval’s terms and conditions.
Ø
Wastewater containing
retentate from the separator;
§
SW 204 Sludges
containing one or several metals including chromium, copper, nickel, zinc,
lead, cadmium, aluminium, tin, vanadium and beryllium;
Wastewater
are generally subjected to Environmental Quality (Industrial Effluent)
Regulations, 2009 or otherwise subjected to other specific
requirement by the DOE, including their EIA approval’s terms and conditions.
Environmental
issues
§ Dust and other air impurities;
are supposed to flow into the receiving air pollution control equipment
designed to trap, contain and prevent them from entering the atmosphere. The
supposedly ‘cleaner air’ is released out from the stack and shall conform to
the emission standard set under Environmental Quality
(Clean Air) Regulations, 1978 or, other specific requirement by the DOE, including their EIA
approval’s terms and conditions.
§ Fugitive dust and fly-ash;
escapes from their respective contained equipment and ductings may enter the
surrounding ambience depending on their size, wind velocity and direction and
other geo-metereological factors. The Malaysian Interim Ambient Air Guidelines may be applied as a legal directive.
§ Heat;
or thermal effect into the surrounding air is affecting surrounding environment
but not regulated in the local environmental law. However, heat is known to be conducted through rock structures stretching
from beneath the furnace or kiln and causes an impact to vegetation growing immediately
above the same seam of rock which are located elsewhere.
§ Solid waste – defected or
broken parts; The fact is these parts are
usually contaminated with hazardous deposts mentioned earlier, otherwise, it’s
worth to recover and recycle these metal wastes
§ Slag deposit;
are likely to to subscribe to to the Environmental
Quality (Scheduled Wastes) Regulations, 2005
Bottom ash; that consists of an array of toxic and hazardous
elements are usually handled via a special Ash Management Program as stipulated
under EIA
approval’s terms and conditions and may be classified as
SW 104 Dust, slag, dross or ash containing arsenic,
mercury, lead, cadmium, chromium, nickel, copper, vanadium, beryllium,
antimony, tellurium, thallium or selenium excluding slag from iron and steel
factory
and managed as Scheduled Waste.
Electrostatic
precipitation(18) removes particles
from the exhaust gas stream of an industrial process. Often the process
involves combustion, but it can be any industrial process that would otherwise
emit particles to the atmosphere. Six activities typically take place:
v
Ionization - Charging of
particles;
v
Migration - Transporting the
charged particles to the collecting surfaces; and
v
Collection - Precipitation of
the charged particles onto the collecting surfaces; and
v
Charge Dissipation - Neutralizing the
charged particles on the collecting surfaces; and
v
Particle Dislodging - Removing the
particles from the collecting surface to the hopper; and
v
Particle Removal - Conveying the
particles from the hopper to a disposal point.
The major precipitator components that accomplish
these activities are as follows:
§Discharge Electrodes
Power Components
§ Precipitator Controls
§ Rapping Systems
§ Purge Air Systems
§ Flue Gas Conditioning
§Discharge Electrodes
Power Components
§ Precipitator Controls
§ Rapping Systems
§ Purge Air Systems
§ Flue Gas Conditioning
Environmental Issues:
Ash: collected from the bottom of ESP as trapped ash shall be
subjected to specific Ash Management Program approved by the authorities,
however, it may be classified as SW
104
Dust, slag, dross or ash containing arsenic, mercury, lead, cadmium, chromium,
nickel, copper, vanadium, beryllium, antimony, tellurium, thallium or selenium
excluding slag from iron and steel factory as Scheduled
Waste.
Stack Emission: is subjected to emission standard under the
Environmental Quality (Clean Air) Regulations, 1978 and other legal biding specification listed in
the EIA approval’s terms and conditions.
Risk of fire or
explosion exists in several electrostatic precipitators,
mainly because of the production of CO.(19)
Environmental issue:
· Power generation has been estimated to
be second only to agriculture in being the largest
domestic user of water.
· The U.S. Geological
Survey estimates that thermoelectric plants withdrew 195 billion gallons of
water per day in 2000, of which 136 billion gallons was fresh water.(20)
General numbers for fresh water
usage of different power sources are shown below.(21)
Water usage (gal/MW-h)
|
|||
Power source
|
Low case
|
Medium/Average case
|
High case
|
400 (once-through cooling)
|
400 to 720 (pond cooling)
|
720 (cooling towers)
|
|
300
|
480
|
||
100 (once-through cycle)
|
180 (with cooling towers)
|
||
1,430
|
|||
1,060
|
|||
1,800
|
4,000
|
||
300
|
480
|
||
30
|
|||
.5
|
1
|
2.2
|
· To produce and burn
the 1 billion tons of coal America
uses each year, the mining and utility industries withdraw 55 trillion to 75 trillion gallons of water annually, according to
the US Geological Survey.
Researchers at Sandia National Laboratories put
the estimate higher, finding that the typical 500-megawatt coal-fired utility burns 250 tons of coal per hour, using 12 million gallons of water an hour - 300 million gallons a day - for cooling.(22)
Steam turbines have been used predominantly as prime
mover in all thermal power stations. The steam turbines are mainly divided into
two groups: -
1. Impulse turbine
2. Impulse-reaction turbine
The turbine generator consists
of a series of steam turbines interconnected to each other and a generator
on a
common shaft. There is a high pressure turbine at one end,
followed by an intermediate pressure
turbine, two low pressure turbines,
and the generator. The steam at high temperature (536 ‘c to 540 ‘c) and
pressure (140 to 170 kg/cm2) is expanded in the turbine. Steam turbines can be a very reliable
equipment with life over 30 years and overhaul
approximately every 10 years.
However, about 5 percent of the indsutrial and utility turbines experience corrosion and deposition problem. Mostly due to LP blade and blade attachment
(disc rim) corrosion fatigue or stress corrosion failures. (23)
Environmental issues:
v Spent or Used Hydraulic Fluid; are subjected to
legal requirements under Environmental Quality (Scheduled Wastes) Regulations,
2005 - SW
306 Spent hydraulic oil
v Broken Oil Seals and Caskets, including hydraulic fluid pumps, hydraulic actuators,
as well as the solenoids, and servo valves, etc.; are subjected to legal
requirements under Environmental Quality (Scheduled Wastes) Regulations,
2005 - SW
422 A mixture of scheduled and non-scheduled wastes
v Scales and varnish-like deposits; a compositional and
TCLP analysis is recommended prior arriving to a legal conclusion – the result
is useful to determine if its classification is (SW
204 - Sludges containing one or several metals including
chromium, copper, nickel, zinc, lead, cadmium, aluminium, tin, vanadium and
beryllium) or (SW 205 - Waste gypsum
arising from chemical industry or power plant)
v Used Oil Filters; are subjected to
legal requirements under Environmental Quality (Scheduled Wastes) Regulations,
2005 - SW
410
Rags, plastics, papers or filters
contaminated with scheduled wastes.
v Contaminated Gloves & Rags; are subjected to legal requirements under Environmental Quality (Scheduled Wastes) Regulations, 2005 - SW 410 Rags, plastics, papers or filters contaminated with scheduled wastes.
v Broken Metal Blades and other Metal Parts; these engineered
high quality metal parts may be repaired or disposed in most economic manner.
v
Rust Dust; Despite its
associated potential risk to human health, these dust are scattered around the
working area and difficult to collect and contain. In practice mass cleaning
using wet-jet or vacuum machine cleaners are being done and regarded as ‘normal’
utility waste.
Legal Liability
The Scheduled Waste Management carries a maximum
penalty of RM500,000.00 and/or 5 years
in cases when the scheduled waste (SW) are transported by non-DOE-approved SW contractors to destination, facilities or
premises not authorized/licensed to
receive, store, transit, treat or dispose them.
Generator or Alternator
is the electrical end of a turbo-generator set. It is generally known as the
piece of equipment that converts the mechanical energy of turbine into
electricity. The generation of electricity is based on the principle of electromagnetic induction.
Environmental issue:
v Noise; its permitted level shall conform to the limits allowed by the DOE under their
EIA Approval terms and conditions or the overall power plant’s blanket
approval. In many instances a doule standard for the day and night is
imposed. The approval may specify the number of noise level parameters, monitoring
points, sampling frequency and its general location. However, the exact location of these monitoring
points should be based on a throrough ‘Noise-Mapping’
survey with adequate rationalization
based on environmental receptors
fully illustrated in a layout plan and be submitted to the agency for record.
v Vibration;
Despite the absence of specific vibration
monitoring parameters and limits as legal requirement in the EQA’74, the DOE
may opt to adapt foreign standards or guidelines to monitor this element of
environmental impact.
v Cooling
fluid; Generally,
if the type of cooling fluid is the oil-water emulsion then their waste forms are subjected to
legal requirements under Environmental Quality (Scheduled Wastes) Regulations,
2005 – SW 307 Spent
mineral oil-water emulsion or,
if they are specific thermal coolants as in conventional radiators; - SW 327 Waste of thermal
fluids (heat transfer) such as ethylene glycol, otherwise in some cases where the hydraulic fluid acts as coolant; - SW 306 Spent
hydraulic oil. So, a proper identification of the types and nature
is crucial prior notification to the DOE.
v Broken
parts: If any
generator in power plants is regarded
by the DOE as and
electrical-electronic based equipment, its waste/used electrical parts may be
classified as SW
110
- Waste from electrical and electronic assemblies containing components such as
accumulators, mercury-switches, glass from cathode-ray tubes and other
activated glass or polychlorinated biphenyl-capacitors, or contaminated with
cadmium, mercury, lead, nickel, chromium, copper, lithium, silver, manganese or
polychlorinated biphenyl.
Otherwise, most of the metal waste may be more economic for disposal to
conventional metal recyclers.
Legal Liability
v Noise emission – contravention may be regarded
as non-compliance to EIA’s terms and
conditions of approval or the ‘blanket’ approval and may be charged under Section 41 of The EQA’74 with a maximum
liability of RM10,000.00 and/or 2 years
imprisonment. Note: Section 23 on noise pollution is not meant for power plants or other
industrial sources.
The Scheduled
Waste Management carries a maximum penalty of RM500,000.00 and/or 5 years in cases when the scheduled waste (SW)
are transported by non-DOE-approved SW
contractors to destination, facilities or premises not authorized/licensed to receive, store, transit, treat or
dispose them.
Fly ash is
generally captured by electrostatic
precipitators or other particle filtration
equipment before the flue gases reach the chimneys of coal-fired power plants,
and together with bottom ash removed
from the bottom of the furnace is in this case jointly known as coal ash.
Depending upon the source and makeup of the coal being burned, the components
of fly ash vary considerably, but all fly ash includes substantial amounts
of silicon dioxide (SiO2)
(both amorphous and crystalline)
and calcium oxide (CaO),
both being endemic ingredients in many coal-bearing rock
strata.(24)
Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) gypsum is also known as scrubber gypsum. FGD gypsum is the
byproduct of an air pollution control system that removes sulfur from the flue
gas in calcium-based scrubbing systems. It is produced by employing forced
oxidation in the scrubber and is composed mostly of calcium sulfate.(25)
However, this waste much sought after by the cement manufacturing industry.
Thus, through a provision called ‘Special
Management of Scheduled Waste’ this waste may have an extended life-cycle
as building materials.
Toxic constituents depend upon the specific coal bed makeup, but may include one or more of
the following elements or substances in quantities from trace amounts to
several percent: arsenic, beryllium, boron, cadmium, chromium, chromium VI, cobalt, lead, manganese, mercury, molybdenum, selenium, strontium, thallium, and vanadium, along with dioxins and PAH compounds.(26)
A 2007 study by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency showed more than 60 sites nationwide where coal ash is suspected or has
been proven to have polluted water. Selenium,
a byproduct of the coal processing that can cause fish and bird deformities, was implicated at more than 20 of the
sites, including Belews Lake in North Carolina — a cooling lake for another
Duke Energy power plant.(27)
Legal
Liability
v Effluent
from Wastewater Treatment Plant or IETS: Prior entering the Ash Pond wastewater
from the facility including surface run-offs are in many cases channeled into
the IETS for treatment aimed not only to remove suspended ash-dust solids but
also trace inorganics such as heavy metals and their compounds. The final
discharge is required to comply to any specification laid under their EIA’s Approval Terms and Conditions
and/or the Environmental Quality (Industrial Effluent)
Regulations, 2009. Contravening the later is
subjected to a maximum liability of RM100,000.00 and/or 5 years imprisonment.
v Sludge from IETS:
is very likely a Scheduled Waste thus rendering it to subscribe to Environmental Quality (Scheduled Wastes) Regulations, 2005 – SW 427 Mineral sludges including calcium hydroxide
sludges, phosphating sludges, calcium sulphite sludges and carbonates sludges
v FGD gypsum: is
a Scheduled Waste thus rendering it to subscribe to Environmental Quality (Scheduled Wastes) Regulations, 2005 - SW 205 Waste gypsum arising from chemical industry or
power plant.
v Ash Pond Overflow
discharges: In some recent examples it is
noted that the treated discharges from the Ash Pond is being reused into the
power plant’s facility and its a noteworthy environmental endeavor.
Nonetheless, its discharges into the receiving water body shall conform to Environmental Quality (Industrial Effluent) Regulations, 2009.
Seepage from Ash Pond: Although in the
construction of recent Ash Ponds certain types of ‘non-pemeable’ layers of
materials were deployed, it is still unclear of it’s permeable-proof qualities.
Geo-textiles are not absolutely permeable-proof though.
It is understandable that energy is a basic need of modern life and that power generation
plants have ‘lit’ our daily and nightly lives. Besides power plants are our
other activities that are equally responsible in ‘shaping’ the ‘quality’ of
life. In other words, everything humans
do, including what NGOs are doing too, are
polluting the environment. The issue of debate and dispute then narrows
down to ‘how much and how long’. There is no
absolute solution to pollution. As we think into it, we’d realise that all
these so called ‘pollution prevention
and control’ efforts simply transform
and transfer them. Thus, it is
important to note that whatever we ‘dump’ into the environment are coming back,
not in the form that we dump, but, in the form of our favourite dish! Biological magnification often refers to the process whereby certain
substances such as pesticides or heavy metals move up the food chain, work their way into rivers or lakes, and are eaten by
aquatic organisms such as fish, which in turn are eaten by large birds, animals
or humans. The substances become concentrated
in tissues or internal organs as
they move up the chain. Bioaccumulants are substances that increase in
concentration in living organisms as they take in contaminated air, water, or
food because the substances are very slowly metabolized or excreted. Although
sometimes used interchangeably with 'bioaccumulation,' an important distinction
is drawn between the two, and with bioconcentration, it is also important to
distinct between sustainable development and overexploitation in biomagnification.
§ Bioaccumulation occurs within a trophic level, and is the increase in
concentration of a substance in certain tissues of organisms' bodies due to
absorption from food and the environment.
Thus
bioconcentration and bioaccumulation occur within an organism, and
biomagnification occurs across trophic (food chain) levels. Biodilution is also a process that occurs to all trophic
levels in an aquatic environment; it is the opposite of biomagnification, thus
a pollutant gets smaller in concentration as it progresses up a food web.(28)
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia will become a net energy
importer before 2020 and is therefore committed
to find alternative means, Deputy Science, Technology and Innovation Minister
Fadillah Yusof said Tuesday.(29)
Environmentalists and alternative energy producers have criticised the approval for Malaysia’s first nuclear power plant saying it was rushed through without adequate public consultation given the risks of radioactivity.(30)
In
some ways wind power has advantages
over solar photovoltaic generation.
Wind blows day or night, sunny or cloudy, and often it can be at its strongest
potential during the coldest and darkest nights of the winter when it is needed
the most. Wind is created when the sun heats certain areas of the Earth's
surface more than others. This is called differential heating, and it induced
both vertical and horizontal air currents. The patterns of these currents are
modified by the Earth's rotation and the contours of the land. Wind is captured
and converted into energy with the use of a wind turbine such as the one shown
in the diagram. As the wind passes the blades of the tower the rotor will be forced to turn. It is
this motion that will turn a generator, thus producing electricity.(33)
Relevant Data from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal
Author: Khalid Mohd Ariff, 19th March 2012
The Ninth Malaysian Plan (2006-2010) targets 350 MW of
grid-connected renewable electricity by with fuel mix of 40 percent gas, 40
percent coal, 10 percent hydropower and 10 percent renewable energy.
Another major development in the offing is the proposed introduction of
feed-in-tariff for renewable energy in 2011.(31)
FWEPS (Float Wave Electric Power Station) is
one of the promising devices for offshore
wave energy conversion which is being developed. The second technique is
the electrolytic installation intended for hydrogen production by means of sea
water electrolysis followed by usage this ecologically safe fuel in different
branches of economy.(32)
Conclusion
There are numerous damaging environmental impacts of coal that occur through
its mining, preparation, combustion, waste storage, and transport as summarized
as follows:
§
Acid mine drainage (AMD) refers to the
outflow of acidic water from coal mines or metal mines, often abandoned mines
where ore- or coal mining activities have exposed rocks containing the
sulphur-bearing mineral pyrite. Pyrite reacts with air and water to form sulphuric
acid and dissolved iron, and as water washes through mines, this compound forms
a dilute acid, which can wash into nearby rivers and streams.
§
Air pollution from coal-fired power plants includes sulfur
dioxide, nitrogen
oxides, particulate
matter (PM), and heavy metals, leading to smog,
acid rain, toxins in the environment, and numerous respiratory, cardiovascular,
and cerebrovascular effects.
§
Air pollution from coal mines is mainly due to emissions of particulate
matter and gases including methane (CH4), sulfur
dioxide (SO2), and nitrogen
oxides(NOx), as well as carbon
monoxide (CO).
§
Climate impacts of coal plants - Coal-fired power plants are responsible for one-third of America’s carbon
dioxide (CO2) emissions, making coal a huge contributor to global
warming. Black carbonresulting from
incomplete combustion is an additional contributor to climate change.
§
Coal dust stirred up during the mining process, as well as
released during coal transport, which can cause severe and potentially deadly
respiratory problems.
§
Coal fires occur in both abandoned coal mines and coal waste piles. Internationally, thousands of underground coal fires are burning
now. Global coal fire emissions are estimated to include 40 tons ofmercury going into the atmosphere annually, and three percent of the world's annual carbon
dioxide emissions.
§
Coal
combustion waste is the nation's second largest waste stream after municipal solid waste. It is disposed of in landfills or "surface impoundments," which
are lined with compacted clay soil, a plastic sheet, or both. As rain filters
through the toxic ash pits year after year, the toxic metals are leached out
into the local environment.
§
Coal sludge, also known as slurry, is the liquid coal waste
generated by washing coal. It is typically disposed of at impoundments located
near coal mines, but in some cases it is directly injected into abandoned
underground mines. Since coal sludge contains toxins, leaks or spills can
endanger underground and surface waters.
§
Floods such as the Buffalo Creek
Flood caused by mountaintop
removal mining and failures of coal mine impoundments.
§
Forest destruction caused by mountaintop
removal mining - According to a 2010 study, mountaintop removal mining has destroyed 6.8%
of Appalachia's forests.
§
Greenhouse gas emissions caused by
surface mining - According to a 2010 study, mountaintop
removal mining releases large amounts of carbon through clearcutting and burning of
trees and through releases of carbon in soil brought to the surface by mining operations.
These greenhouse gas emissions amount to at least 7% of conventional power
plant emissions.
§
Loss or degradation
of groundwater - Since coal seams are often serve as underground aquifers, removal of
coal beds may result in drastic changes in hydrology after mining has been
completed.
§
Radical disturbance of 8.4 million acres
of farmland, rangeland, and forests, most of which has not been reclaimed --
See The footprint
of coal
§
Heavy metals and coal - Coal contains many heavy metals, as it is created through compressed
organic matter containing virtually every element in the periodic table -
mainly carbon, but also heavy metals. The heavy metal content of coal varies by
coal seam and geographic region. Small amounts of heavy metals can be necessary
for health, but too much may cause acute or chronic toxicity (poisoning). Many
of the heavy metals released in the mining and burning of coal are
environmentally and biologically toxic elements, such as lead, mercury, nickel, tin, cadmium, antimony, andarsenic, as well as radio
isotopes of thorium and strontium.
§
Mercury and coal - Emissions from coal-fired power plants are the largest source of mercury in the United States, accounting for about 41 percent (48 tons in 1999) of
industrial releases.
§
Methane released by coal mining accounts for about 10 percent of US releases of methane (CH4), a
potent global warming gas.
§
Mountaintop removal mining and other forms of surface mining can lead to the
drastic alteration of landscapes, destruction of habitat, damages to water
supplies, and air pollution. Not all of these effects can be adequately
addressed through coal mine
reclamation.
§
Particulates and coal - Particulate matter (PM) includes the
tiny particles of fly ash and dust that are expelled from coal-burning power plants. Studies have shown that exposure to particulate matter is related to an
increase of respiratory and cardiac mortality.
§
Radioactivity and coal - Coal contains minor amounts of the radioactive elements, uranium and
thorium. When coal is burned, the fly ash contains uranium and thorium "at up to 10 times their original
levels."
§
Subsidence - Land subsidence
may occur after any type of underground mining, but it is particularly common
in the case of longwall
mining.
§
Sulfur dioxide and coal - Coal-fired power plants are the largest human-caused source of sulfur
dioxide, a pollutant gas that contributes to the production of acid rain and
causes significant health problems. Coal naturally contains sulfur, and when
coal is burned, the sulfur combines with oxygen to form sulfur oxides.
§
Thermal pollution from coal plants is the degradation of water quality by power plants and industrial
manufacturers - when water used as a coolant is returned to the natural
environment at a higher temperature, the change in temperature impacts
organisms by decreasing oxygen supply, and affecting ecosystem composition.
§
Toxins - According to a
July 2011 NRDC report, "How Power Plants Contaminate
Our Air and States" electricity generation in the U.S. releases 381,740,601 lbs. of toxic air
pollution annually, or 49% of total national emissions, based on data from the
EPA’s Toxic Release Inventory (2009 data, accessed June 2011). Power plants are
the leading sources of toxic air pollution in all but four of the top 20 states
by electric sector emissions.
§
Transportation - Coal is often
transported via trucks, railroads, and large cargo ships, which release air
pollution such as soot and can lead to disasters that ruin the environment, such as the Shen Neng 1 coal carrier collision
with the Great Barrier Reef, Australia that occurred in
April 2010.
§
Waste coal, also known as "culm," "gob," or "boney," is
made up of unused coal mixed with soil and rock from previous mining
operations. Runoff from waste coal sites can pollute local water supplies.[28]
§
Water consumption from coal plants - Power generation has been estimated to be second only to agriculture in
being the largest domestic user of water.
§
Water pollution from coal includes the negative health and environmental effects from the mining,
processing, burning, and waste storage of coal.
Relevant Data from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal
Energy density
Main article: Energy value of coal
The energy density of coal can also be expressed in kilowatt-hours, the units that electricity is most commonly sold in, per units of mass to estimate how much coal is required to power electrical appliances. One kilowatt-hour is 3.6 MJ, so the energy density of coal is 6.67 kW·h/kg. The typical thermodynamic efficiency of coal power plants is about 30%, so of the 6.67 kW·h of energy per kilogram of coal, 30% of that—2.0 kW·h/kg—can successfully be turned into electricity; the rest is waste heat. So coal power plants obtain approximately 2.0 kW·h per kilogram of burned coal.
As an example, running one 100-watt lightbulb for one year requires 876 kW·h (100 W × 24 h/day × 365 day/year = 876000 W·h = 876 kW·h). Converting this power usage into physical coal consumption:
For a coal power plant with a 40% efficiency, it takes 325 kg (714 lb) of coal to power a 100 W lightbulb for one year.[60] One should also take into account transmission and distribution losses caused by resistance and heating in the power lines, which is in the order of 5–10%, depending on distance from the power station and other factors.
Carbon intensity
Commercial coal has a carbon content of at least 70%. Coal with a heating value of 6.67 kWh per kilogram as quoted above has a carbon content of roughly 80%, which is
- , where 1 mol equals to NA (Avogadro Number) atoms.
Carbon combines with oxygen in the atmosphere during combustion, producing carbon dioxide, with an atomic weight of (12 + 16 × 2 = 44 kg/kmol). The CO2 released to air for each kilogram of incinerated coal is therefore
- .
This can be used to calculate an emission factor for CO2 from the use of coal power. Since the useful energy output of coal is about 31% of the 6.67 kWh/kg(coal),[61] the burning of 1 kg of coal produces about 2 kWh of electrical energy. Since 1 kg coal emits 2.93 kg CO2, the direct CO2 emissions from coal power are 1.47 kg/kWh, or about 0.407 kg/MJ.
The U.S. Energy Information Agency's 1999 report on CO2 emissions for energy generation,[62] quotes a lower emission factor of 0.963 kg CO2/kWh for coal power. The same source gives a factor for oil power in the U.S. of 0.881 kg CO2/kWh, while natural gas has 0.569 kg CO2/kWh. Estimates for specific emission from nuclear power, hydro, and wind energy vary, but are about 100 times lower.
References;
7)
Christman, R.C., J. Haslbeck, B.
Sedlik, W. Murray, and W. Wilson. 1980. Activities, effects and impacts of
the coal fuel cycle for a 1,000-MWe electric power generating plant.
Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
8)
Gregory J. Pond et.al., “Downstream effects of mountaintop
coal mining: comparing biological conditions using family- and genus-level
macroinvertebrate bioassessment tools”, Region 3, US Environmental Protection
Agency
13)
Angie M. Cook and Steven J. Fritz “Environmental
Impacts of Acid Leachate Derived from Coal-Storage Piles upon Groundwater”
14)
Ferdinger et.al “Characterization of Organic Material Leached
from Coal by Simulated Rainfall”, in Environmental
Science and Technology, 1989, 23, 170-177
15)
CLETE R.
STEPHAN, P.E.MINE, ‘COAL DUST EXPLOSION HAZARDS’ SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMININSTRATION PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, p.8, year – unknown, p.8
19)
István
Kiss, Tamás Iváncsy, Bálint Németh, István Berta, ‘Advanced Risk Analysis for the
Application of ESP-s to Clean Flammable Gas-pollutant Mixtures’, in 11th International Conference on
Electrostatic Precipitation, pp.50
20)
Lance Frazer, "Low water consumption: a new
goal for coal" in Environmental
Health Perspectives, April, 2004
22)
Sierra Crane-Murdoch, "A Desperate Clinch: Coal
Production Confronts Water Scarcity" Circle of Blue, August 3, 2010
23)
Otakar Jones & Lee
Machemar, ‘Steam Turbines Corrosion and Deposition Problem and Solutions; turbolab.tamu.edu
26)
Source: Managing Coal Combustion Residues in Mines, Committee
on Mine Placement of Coal Combustion Wastes, National Research Council of the
National Academies, 2006; and Human and Ecological Risk Assessment of Coal
Combustion Wastes, RTI, Research Triangle Park, August 6, 2007, prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
30)
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/nuke-plant-jolts-environmentalists(May 5, 2010)
Author: Khalid Mohd Ariff, 19th March 2012
Reach for the writer Khalid Mohd Ariff
e-mail: sekitar5221@gmail.com
Tel: 019-7725676, +607-2441221
No comments:
Post a Comment