This write-up is related to my earlier post
titled ‘The E.M.P (Environmental
Management Program)’. Here, a sample of the terms and conditions of an approved
EIA is displayed, and, as I mentioned then that this is amongst the basis
of establishing an EMP. The checklist
consists of all the terms of approval from the authority i.e. the DOE in
Malaysia, and in this example, it’s for a new electrical powered intercity
public train rail track system. In this project both the project proponent and its main
contractor are certified ISO14001.
I hope readers who are pursuing civil engineering, environmental engineering,
environmental sciences, occupational health and safety, urban and town
planning, etc. would treat this example as a connotation of the likely demands in
one’s career. Welcome to the multi-disciplinary integrated ‘web’ of
environmental management where collective decisions is the ‘operating system’ and
more than 10 agencies are appointed ‘browsers’. This example is one of their
many endeavors that illustrate the shared-responsibility.
My personal opinion on the EIA conditions concludes this article. Bon voyage! 
Electrified Double Track Train EIA – Sample
Checklist on EIA Approval Conditions
(Note: the project title, its
owners, municipals and the respective provinces were omitted in ensuring the
integrity of this article.)
This
checklist was produced by the main contractor’s HSE team by referring to the EIA
approval issued to the project owner (project proponent), after the former was
awarded the construction job. Their purpose for creating this checklist is as
follows;
- Establish an EMP based on special EMP format issued by the DOE;
- Subjected to DOE consent;
- Referred as ‘legal standard’ for the
      DOE;
- Evidence of associated legal
      liability.
- Distribution to their Environmental Unit as the
     main ‘Audit Standard’ for their
     scheduled audits;
- Basis of a continuous environmental
      surveillance;
- Basis of training for their project
      managers, construction managers, engineers etc.
- Record of compliance throughout the
      project; (as seen in column ‘compliance actions’ below)
- Distribution to their construction team as to
     integrate it into their detailed
     construction plan;
- Cascaded to respective
      sub-contractors;
- Environmental standards imposed upon
      sub-contractors;
- Basis of trainings and briefings to
      sub-contractors;
- Basis of penalty for their non-compliance;
- Updated reference of compliance when facilitating
     site-visits and inspection by
     authorities.
| 
EIA Conditions of Approval | 
Compliance Actions | ||||||||||||
| 
COMPLIANCE | |||||||||||||
| 
1. | 
All mitigation and control
  measures outlined in the report and additional information as listed below
  prepared by the EIA consultant, (Consultant).
  are to be complied fully:- 
(i)                 
  EIA report entitled
  Environmental Impact Assessment For the Proposed Electrified Double Tracking
  Railway Project Between (town) - (town), Final Report, July 2002; 
(ii)               
  Additional information titled
  ‘Environmental Impact Assessment For the Proposed Electrified Double Tracking
  Railway Project Between (town) - (town), Final Report Addendum 1 (Soil Erosion
  & Sedimentation), August 2002’; and 
(iii)              
  Additional Information titled
  ‘Jawapan Perunding EIA Kepada Soalan dan Komen-Komen,  Cadangan 
  Pembinaan Landasan Berkembar Elektrik Antara (town)
  - (town) oleh (Project
  Proponent) submitted to the DOE on 4th October 2002. | 
The Project proponent will
  comply with the mitigation and control measure outlined in the EIA report for
  all items which cause by the project proponent during the construction stage.
   | |||||||||||
| 
PROJECT
  CONCEPT | |||||||||||||
| 
2. | 
The development is confined to
  the construction of the railway track and other related components for a
  distance of (project length in km) from (town) - (town). | 
There are no changes to the
  project concept. | |||||||||||
| 
3. | 
Traffic management plans
  covering any diversions are to be prepared and approved by the related Local Authorities. | 
Traffic management plan will be
  prepared and seek approval from (Local Authorities)
  where necessary. | |||||||||||
| 
4. | 
Structures such as the railroad
  bridges or vehicular crossing or any overhead for pedestrians are to be
  constructed at areas where the public used for crossing.  | 
Pedestrian or vehicular crossing
  will be provided as needed according to construction requirements.  | |||||||||||
| 
5. | 
The routes for vehicles
  transporting construction material are to be planned well to reduce
  disturbance to the residential areas and other main users. | 
The project proponents will plan
  the routes for vehicles transporting construction material. The routes to be
  used where possible shall avoid the residential areas in the vicinity of the
  track. | |||||||||||
| 
6. | 
Any tree cutting or the
  relocation of trees and the landscape plan is to be submitted and approved by
  the Local Authority. | 
Will inform Local Authority and
  seek advice before is such cases happen. | |||||||||||
| 
7. | 
The relocation of squatters,
  public amenities or basic facilities is to be implemented as per agreement
  with the relevant State Authorities /Local Authorities. | 
Matters pertaining to the
  relocation of squatters will be discussed with (Project
  Proponent) or relevant Authority before implementation. | |||||||||||
| 
8. | 
‘Culverts’ are to be constructed
  close to the forest so that the wild life such as wild pigs, leopard and
  antelopes can cross over the railway track. | 
(Main
  Contractor) will obtained clearance from the
  Department of Wildlife for each construction package to ensure that culverts
  or necessary measure for wildlife is required or otherwise.   | |||||||||||
| 
9. | 
Wildlife crossing are to be
  constructed in areas where groups of primates are located such as monkeys,
  baboons and others to ease crossing the electrified railway track. | 
(Main
  Contractor) will obtained clearance from the
  Department of Wildlife for each construction package to ensure that the wild
  life crossings are required or otherwise. 
   | |||||||||||
| 
NOISE CONTROL
   | |||||||||||||
| 
10. | 
The noise levels at the boundary
  of the project during construction is to be control so as not to exceed 65 dBA
  (daytime) and 55 dBA (nighttime). For areas where the alignment is located
  close to houses, construction at night is not allowed.  | 
Noise measurements shall be
  monitored during the construction activities so that the noise levels are
  kept below 65 dBA (daytime) and 55 dBA (nighttime). If construction in night
  time is inevitable, the noise level shall be control under 55 dBA as per
  requirement. | |||||||||||
| 
11 | 
The noise levels during
  operation are to comply to the following levels for each category of
  receptor. 
 
The L90 is to be determined and
  agreed by the DOE prior to the operations of the electrified double tracking
  line. The measurements are to follow the ‘Procedure For Measurement Of Noise Emission
  Levels’ published by DOE and to be conducted by a certified acoustic
  engineer.  
(Note: L90 is the noise
  measurement representing 90% of the noise at site prior to the operational of
  the project). | 
The design of the railway track
  based on international standards takes into account of the noise levels with
  the movement of the trains. Noise level shall be monitored by the operator
  during operations to ascertain the effectiveness of the measure in place.     | |||||||||||
| 
12. | 
In areas where the reserves are
  limited or too near especially in areas between housing schemes and school,
  control measures such as the installation of ‘noise barriers’ are to be
  implemented. The steps taken should be able to reduce noise to levels as
  outlined in condition 10 and 11 above. Measures to control vibration are to
  be implemented especially for routes crossing housing areas and sensitive
  areas. | 
There are no schools located
  close to the railway track ROW. Nevertheless noise barriers will be provided
  in areas identified as extremely sensitive which will be reviewed together
  with (Project Proponent).  | |||||||||||
| 
SAFETY AND
  EMERGENCY CONTROL | |||||||||||||
| 
13. | 
Emergency Response Plan that
  outlines actions that are to be taken if any accidents occur such as oil
  spills or toxic releases to avoid contamination to air, soil river and
  groundwater is to be prepared and submitted to Jabatan Keretapi  | 
The Emergency Response Plan has
  been prepared and submitted to the DOE (HQ), Respective state DOE offices and
  (Project Proponent).   | |||||||||||
| 
14. | 
All Control measures to reduce
  vibration and nuisance to structures during the construction works and
  operational stage are to be implemented. | 
Vibration monitoring will be
  conducted during construction to ensure vibration levels are kept within
  acceptable limits. | |||||||||||
| 
15. | 
Adequate
  temporary barriers are to be constructed especially in areas where the
  reserves are limited during the construction activities. | 
Temporary barriers shall be
  provided in areas identified. | |||||||||||
| 
CONSTRUCTION
  AND EARTHWORKS CONTROL | |||||||||||||
| 
16. | 
The scheduling of the earthworks
  is to be synchronized with the dry season to reduce sediments. | 
Adequate mitigation measure will
  be taken to ensure Earthworks construction will not have any adverse impact
  on the surrounding environment. | |||||||||||
| 
17. | 
Any excess earth available at
  site is to be used as bunds at the boundary of the project site. The bunds
  are to be compacted and landscape. | 
It is anticipated that there
  will not be any excess earth at site. However, in the event that there is
  excess earth this will be used as landscaping purposes or transport to
  adequate landfill area.   | |||||||||||
| 
18. | 
Effective measure including
  resolving issue at the design stage as recommended by JPS in areas that have
  been identified as potential flood areas are to be implemented.  | 
All requirement outline in the
  Urban Storm Water  
Management Manual (MASMA) where
  relevant will be complied accordingly.  | |||||||||||
| 
19. | 
Any earth to be imported to the
  site is to be conducted after the paddy harvesting period. Monitoring shall
  be conducted to ensure construction work do not cause toxic effect to the
  paddy areas.  | 
Will comply and ensure fill
  material do not cause toxic effects to the paddy areas. | |||||||||||
| 
WATER QUALITY
  CONTROL | |||||||||||||
| 
20. | 
Temporary toilet facilities,
  meeting the Ministry of Health specification are to be made available at the
  workers camp before construction works begin.  | 
Temporary toilet facilities will
  be provided at the identified site offices and workers camp. And shall comply
  with Specification from the Ministry of Health for toilet facilities.   | |||||||||||
| 
21. | 
Silt traps,
  sediment ponds and the drainage system such as the perimeter drain and other
  in area that can channel runoffs are to be prepared prior to any land
  clearing works at the site. The details for the location of this system are
  to be submitted to the DOE. Any discharges from the sedimentation pond to any
  water course shall not contain any suspended solids in excess of 100mg/l.
  Monitoring of the discharges from the sedimentation pond during construction
  shall be conducted.  | 
Silt trap and
  other mitigation measure shall be installed along the railway track route
  subject to the condition of site.  | |||||||||||
| 
22. | 
Effective
  measure to avoid water pollution due to earthwork and construction activities
  (such as oil spills) is to implement especially for sensitive areas such as
  the (An Environmental Sensitive Area) which
  has a water intake point.  | 
All skid tanks
  installed at the construction sites will be provided with secondary
  containment to collect any spillages and thus avoiding water pollution at
  site.  | |||||||||||
| 
WASTES DISPOSAL | |||||||||||||
| 
23. | 
A good solid
  waste management system is to be provided and the waste are to be disposed at
  approved Local Authorities dumping site. | 
A waste
  management system shall be provided for the site. All wastes shall be
  stockpiled at a dedicated area near the ROW and the wastes shall be disposed
  at approval Local Authorities dumping site.  | |||||||||||
| 
24. | 
Scheduled
  wastes such as ‘spent oil’, ‘hydraulic oil’ and others have to be managed
  according to the requirement outline in the Environmental Quality (Scheduled Wastes)
  Regulations, 2005. | 
Used oil from
  machinery and vehicle shall be collected and stored temporary at the
  designated maintenance yard. A vendor licensed by the DOE shall be appointed
  to collect the used oil for disposal purposes.   | |||||||||||
| 
AIR QUALITY CONTROL | |||||||||||||
| 
25. | 
Land clearing
  is to be conducted in stages and confined to areas to be developed only. | 
Land clearing
  will be control to a minimal level. | |||||||||||
| 
26. | 
Open surface,
  especially in areas where routes for heavy construction machinery are used
  are to be kept wet so as not to be dusty during the earthwork stage.  | 
A water browser
  shall be used to suppress any fugitive dusts that may result from the
  movement of vehicle at site.   | |||||||||||
| 
27. | 
Wheels of
  machinery and vehicles are to be kept clean prior to moving on to public
  roads.  | 
A wheel washing
  trough or other washing facilities will be provided at all main access to the
  construction site so that wheels are kept cleaned prior to moving on the
  roads. | |||||||||||
| 
28. | 
Open burning of
  biomass and construction wastes is prohibited at all times.  | 
All workers
  will be trained prior to any works at site to ensure that all environmental
  requirements are followed closely including the need to observe no open
  burning. | |||||||||||
| 
MANAGEMENT OF ARTIFACTS | |||||||||||||
| 
29. | 
Control measure
  relating to the transfer, salvage and conservation of any artifacts of
  historical values as agreed by (Project Proponent)
  in Jadual A, Minutes to the EIA Meeting for the Proposed Electrified Double
  Railway Track Between (town to town) dated 15
  September 2002 is too implemented. | 
The Project
  proponent will discuss with (Project Proponent)
  and confirm the necessary measures that need to be taken for the structures
  listed within Jadual A. | |||||||||||
| 
MONITORING PROGRAMS | |||||||||||||
| 
30. | 
Monitoring
  programs for air quality, noise levels, vibration and water quality taking
  into account the sampling stations and frequency of sampling is to be
  submitted to DOE’s office in (name of affected
  states/provinces) for agreement 3 month prior to any works. | 
The proposed
  program, frequency and sampling station will be listed within the submit EMP. | |||||||||||
| 
ENVIROMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN | |||||||||||||
| 
31. | 
An Environment Management
  Plan according to the format given is to be submitted to the DOE’s Office in (name of affected states/provinces) for agreement
  and a copy is to be submitted to The DOE’s Headquarter, 3 month prior to any
  works at site. The EMP is to be reviewed from time to time meet current
  requirement.  | 
EMP will be
  prepare, submit and review accordingly. | |||||||||||
| 
32. | 
The reports are
  to be submitted to the DOE’s Office (name of
  affected states/provinces) with a copy to the DOE’s Headquarters once
  in 3 months from the date of commencement.  | 
The report will
  be submitted accordingly. | |||||||||||
| 
33. | 
The following
  reports are to be submitted to the DOE’s office in (name
  of affected states/provinces) with a copy to DOE Headquarters:- 
(i)                 
  A water quality monitoring
  and assessment report once in 3 month from the earthworks. The monitoring
  program shall include testing Parameters such as BOD, COD, DO, TSS, Oil &
  Grease, pH, Turbidity and Ammoniacal Nitrogen. 
(ii)               
  Ambient air quality
  monitoring and assessment report once in 3 month from the date of earthworks.
  The monitoring program shall include parameters such as TSP,SOx and NOx. 
(iii)              
  Noise and vibration
  monitoring and analysis at the boundary of the project during construction
  and operation stage to be conducted and its report submitted once in 3 month. | 
The baseline
  water quality, air quality, noise and vibration levels shall be reestablished
  prior to the construction activities at site and sampling shall be conducted
  as per the recommendations outline in this EMP. | |||||||||||
| 
ADMINISTRATION | |||||||||||||
| 
34. | 
The project
  proponent is to including the EIA approval conditions as part of the Contract
  Document for all contract involved with the development of the project and
  all EIA approval conditions shall have to be complied accordingly.   | 
The project
  proponent will undertake full responsibilities for the EIA approval conditions
  and will include it under the contract to other contractor where applicable. | |||||||||||
| 
35. | 
The DOE’s Office
  in (name of affected states/provinces) is to
  informed in writing, the actual dates the project begin not later than 14
  days after the project starts and 14 days after the project completed. | 
The DOE’s
  Office in (name of affected states/provinces) will
  be informed on the commencement | |||||||||||
| 
36. | 
The DOE is to
  be informed in writing of any changes in the management or ownership of the
  project. The EIA approval conditions are to be included in any change in
  ownership for the Proposed Project.   | 
The DOE shall
  be informed if there are any changes in the management of the project. | |||||||||||
| 
37. | 
A copy of the
  EIA approval conditions together will all the relevant documents  that forms part of the EIA approval
  conditions are to be exhibited in a suitable place at the project site from
  the date of earthworks . | 
A copy of the
  EIA approval condition shall be exhibited at all the site offices identified
  for the project. | |||||||||||
Personal Comment

Item-8 & 10; ‘close to houses’ – specifying the distance is a better option;
Item – 8; ‘cross-over’ or ‘cross-under’ the culvert?
Item-10;        Imposing
restricted noise level is relevant. But these arbitraries seemed least
realistic; as in remote village or areas with almost minimal human activities
the noise measurement are generally at much lower range about 30 – 40 dBA. Say,
imposing a 55dBA in the day as the project starts would disallow heavy machineries
such as prime-movers, generator-sets, back-hoe, excavators, etc. to work there
as they are powered by large and noisy diesel engines. However, the noise level
for the electric train operation (item-11) may be applicable as noise is
presumed to be generated from the sound of frictions only.
Item-12 & 14; I have imparted and shared with participants in most of my training on Pollution & Control that; the brick-wall noise barrier is not a good solution simply because it’s an eye-sore to sights and seeing. For and electric train when noise is far less it is much more favorable to have ‘green-walls’ from dense shrubs species that could be planted and maintained at just 4 feet height. It could also hinder wild animals from crossing the rail track when they are planted in a correct configuration. (see picture below)
Item-16; should alter the last part of the sentence to ‘to reduce sedimentation of receiving water bodies from surface run-off’
Personal Inference
These terms and conditions are adequate to prevent the occurrence of
environmental impact in the form of water, noise, air and groundwater pollution
at a severity level which is conspicuous to the public, if adhered to promptly.
Of course, some may argue that this project has maimed the bio-diversity and
geological settings of the affected earth profiles. My simple answer to this
argument is: All human activities do
affect the environment, and, there is no absolute solution to pollution!
But, at least this project is a public transport, well, inevitably incurring
some cost to our environment but, it’ll help the people to travel conveniently,
and, the dispersed emission from automobile if they drive cars, are now
centralized at power generation plant that powers these electrified trains. Apparently,
I believe, from the viewpoint of Life-Cycle-Assessment, even the electric cars
can’t match the environmental economics of these electric trains! In other
words, its environmental benefits surpassed its cost. So, how about employing electric
tramps or carriages in the cities and residential areas? I sincerely hope that the
next batch of ‘Yang Berhormat’ who
are entrusted with the transport portfolio be not mere technocrats but instead
empathetic environmentalists who are altruistic if not holly-hearted, who’d
bring more greener practices for the ‘rakyat’ (people). As from where I am it’s
still ‘A Track Too Far’.





 
No comments:
Post a Comment